Skip to main content

tv   The Rachel Maddow Show  MSNBC  May 13, 2011 9:00pm-10:00pm EDT

9:00 pm
they're like the winkle vosz twins of getting bin laden. >> the laughs get the last word for this week. you can have the last word or the last laugh online at our blog. you can follow my tweets. "rachel maddow show" is up next. good evening, rachel. have a great weekend. thanks to you at home for staying with us for the next hour. whether or not former republican senator john ensign is going to go to prison may ultimately turn on the question of how much he lied to his own dad. that is what it may come down to for the disgraced former senator from nevada. john ensign implicating his own parents in the cover up and ethics scandal around his extramarital affair is one of the human factors that comes into the sharpest relief with the new details that have just emerged from the special con sell investigation into mr. ensign's actions. mr. ensign implicating his own parents is also legally one of the most important aspects of this whole thing. without going into every detail
9:01 pm
of it, the bottom here is when john ensign paid his mistress $96,000 in what very much looked like hush money, he may have been breaking the law. if that was severance, if that was money he was paying to her as part of the process of firing her, that would be illegal. what john ensign tried to say instead was that the $96,000 he paid her was just a present. a gift. it was a present from his mom and dad to his mistress. and because he knew that would sound exactly as not credible as it sounds to you hearing it right now, john ensign had to concoct a strange story to support it. he had his lawyer put out an official statement about it saying the reason senator ensign's mom and dad were paying his mistress $96,000 was because they were always doing stuff like that. it was a pattern of generosity. they loved giving presents like say $96,000 checks to john ensign's mistress and her
9:02 pm
family. they did stuff like that all the time. it was just part of a pattern. convincing people of that story however farfetched it may be is sort of key to keeping john ensign out of jail. my mom and dad, i can't stop them from giving $96,000 they cans to my mistress. they're doing that constantly. as part of selling that story john ensign had his parents sign legal affidavits swearing that paying the mistress $96,000 was not uncommon. they had done stuff like that before. according to the affidavits they had previously purchased an all expense paid trip to hawaii for the mistress and her family. john ensign's lawyer drew up those statements. mr. ensign had his parents sign them. and then those statements became part of the official investigation into the john ensign ethics scandal. what we now know is john ensign may have implicated his parents legally by having them sign their names to that. john ensign's mom who signed the affidavit was not even consulted
9:03 pm
before it was drawn up and put in front of her. when investigators got john ensign's father, stepfather under oath and started asking him questions about the thing his son had had him son, the dad denied all of it he said quote, that's absolutely false. this payment for these things in hawaii that's absolutely false. we never paid for anything. no, none of that. paid nothing. but remember, if this hawaii story isn't true, if this wasn't the kind of present john ensign's mom and dad were all giving to senator ensign's mistress, then john ensign maybe goes to jail. i don't know where you go for putting your parents in a situation like that, but maybe he goes there, too. even though john ensign resign from the united states senate, the reason the ensign sex and ethics scandal is not over yet is in part because of this brutal evidence which has been handed over to the federal election commission and the justice department. even if the senate can't kick him out for something like this anymore, this is bad enough that he may end up going to jail for
9:04 pm
it. so the next big thing we are waiting for in this story is whether or not the federal election commission or the justice department are going to pursue john ensign on the basis of this new evidence. that is what we are waiting to hear next. there is still a senator who is still in the united states senate who is up to his eyeballs in this scandal and who is not john ensign. it is dr. tom coburn, republican senator from the great state of oklahoma. we've known for a long time that senator coburn was wrapped up in this sex and ethics scandal. but we now seem to have an answer to the question or at least a potential answer to why he had been so squirrely about this for so long. why he has changed his story so many times. what's in this new report suggests that the john ensign scandal is not only morally agree jous than we previously known. the extent described as senator ensign's sexual harassment is way worse than we have known it
9:05 pm
before. but it could potentially involve more legal jeopardy. that could explain why during this entire affair senator tom coburn has been making so many utterly contradict tri statements about it. denying it, undenying it. saying he won't talk about it. talking about it. as everybody else in this situation sees their lives burn down. if tom coburn is going to be the guy who has no consequences from this, who just stays in dust senate and keeps sponsoring family values legislation because he knows begs about these -- best about those matters, then tom coburn coming clean about his role in the john ensign section and ethics scandal cover up is probably the other next big thing that we are all waiting for. from the minute this scandal broke it was clear that senator coburn was tied up in it somehow, he had been all over the map in terps of explaining his involvement. what we now know is it was senator coburn who personally negoiated the amount for a
9:06 pm
settle element payout to the family och senator ensign's mistress the matchtons. the hamptons' lawyer tried to get a ballpark estimate from senator coburn as to the amount he would be comfortable with. the lawyer proprosed $8 million. senator coburn said that the figure was ridiculous. mr. hampton came back with some figures an estimated $1.2 million for their home and another $1.6 million to get started somewhere new. senator coburn responded by saying, quote, okay, that's what i had in mind and i think is fair. that is tragt from the special counsel investigation. senator coburn personally negotiating a financial settlement to keep the affair under wraps. but when he was asked back in july 2009 if he had done anything like that, asked if he had any kind of negotiating role in this scandal, senator coburn denied it. he said, quote, i never made any assessment of paying anybody
9:07 pm
anything. those are untruths. those are absolute untruths. after the scandal broke wide open. doug hampton said tom coburn had played a role in trying to connell up with a settle element for the family. tom coburn had tried to work out a settlement for the hampton family to bring the affair to a close quietly by keeping them happy. after doug hampton said that, senator coburn told a newspaper quote, i categorically deny everything he said. we now have the details know that tom coburn had multiple phone calls with doug hampton's lawyer in addition to haggling for an overall lower payout amount to the hamptons, quote, senator coburn then stated that the ensigns should buy the hamptons home because it is so close to the ensigns and the hamptons should receive an amount of money above and beyond that t start over. despite having played that negotiating role in the cover up of the affair, here's what tom
9:08 pm
coburn told abc about it. >> there was no negotiations. there was a pass it along. >> there was no negotiations. in keeping with senator coburn's ostentatious self-declared piety, his political brand, how religious and upstandingly ethical he is, tom coburn told reporters after the scandal broke, quote, i was counselling senator ensign as a physician and as an ordained decon. that is privileged communication that i will never reveal to anybody not to the ethics committee, not to a court of law, not to anybody. mr. coburn apparently providing mistress payoff haggling services in his capacity as a deacon. in his capacity as a physician tom coburn proid vieding join kolg advice. saying he can't disclose those confers because of professional
9:09 pm
obligations. he would not disclose to a court of law. not to a ethics committee. now what we know is shortly after saying that tom coburn did secretly start cooperating with fbi agents. turning over thousands of pages of documents to federal prosecutors and sitting for interviews with the justice department and the senate ethics committee, which of course he said he would never do. there's one thing that is still unresolved. according to the special counsel as part of senator coburn's role as mistress payout negotiator, the senator personally called john ensign's dad at one point to try to get the senior mr. ensign involved in the process of covering up the affair. or at least ending it. one witness swears, sworn testimony gives sworn testimony that this phone call happened. senator ensign's dad says he doesn't necessarily remember, but he acknowledges it may have happened. as for mr. coburn, he absolutely denies it. given everything else that tom
9:10 pm
coburn has explained already about his involvement in this scandal, do you believe him? joining us now is melanie sloan executive director for responsibility of ethics in washington. her group's complaint about senator ensign led to the special report. they have filed a spart complaint about senator coburn's involvement. thanks very much for being here. >> nice to be with you. >> why did your organization file the complaint about senator coburn specifically? what potential rules violations or criminal violations are you -- do you think should be concerned in terms of senator coburn? >> at the time mr. coburn had been changing his story dramatically. as we can see, he's changed it even through today. but in addition to the constantly changing story, which didn't reflect credibility on the senate, there was a question about whether he con sfiered with doug hampton to help doug hampton violate the lobbying
9:11 pm
ban. there was some evidence including mr. coburn's own words to "the new york times" that mr. hampton brought in the head of ali janet air to come and see mr. coburn. senator coburn just like mr. hampton and mr. ensign was well aware of the senate lobbying revixs. he too may have violated the lobbying ban. listening to you go through all of this, it strikes me that seems quite possible that the justice department gave senator coburn munity. some people have immunity. senator coburn who had some legal liablity issues here may well have been another person to get immunity in order to tell everything he knew and to provide all these documents to the fbi. >> is that the sort of thing that somebody would have to own up to if they were asked, or is that the sort of thing that the justice department -- the ethics committee or senator coburn himself could reasonably keep secret if he had immunity? >> i think whether he could keep
9:12 pm
it secret and if he should are two separate questions. senator coburn owes the american people an explanation. if he indeed got immunity from the department of justice, he should share that. it was clear na the special counsel did not believe senator coburn about whether or not he had called michael ensign. michael ensign then contacts john ensign and john ensign calls his spiritual advisor furious that his father has been contacted. tim coe was quite certain the person that contacted senator ensign's father was senator coburn. given this circumstances i think it is incumbent upon senator coburn who is a sitting senator to lay out what he did. >> what is the status of this complaint? have you ever heard anything back? >> no, we haven't heard anything. it is referenced in is the special counsel's report. i imagine because this was a
9:13 pm
report about senator ensign they didn't address it. imseems incumbent to advise us of the findings to know all the facts in this case. >> as i mentioned in the introduction, the ensign investigation has been turned over both to the justice department and the federal election commission. how confident are you that either of those agencies will proceed against senator ensign now given this additional evidence that was put forth in the special counsel report? >> as i'm sure you know, the fec is a dysfunctional agency. no one should ever wait for them to do anything. the justice department has also previously passed on the ensign matter. and they would have had an awful lot of the evidence that was in the special counsel's report already. so you have to wonder if they'll reconsider. the new facts for them might be the obstruction of justice that senator ensign was in fact destroying evidence and emails in order to avoid having all of the situation come to light.
9:14 pm
so that could cause some additional charges. also as you mentioned there could be charges against senator ensign, but against michael and sharon ensign for the false affidavits to the fec. it's possible they'll reopen it. really the justice department hasn't been particularly aggressive with going after high level political officials ever since they bungled the ted stevens prosecution. >> can i ask you about one former senator that turns up in the special counsel report. he's now a presidential hopeful once again. it's rick santorum. he turns up in the report i believe it's page 42, i've been reeding it over and over again as the man who tipped off senator ensign that the harpton family might be ready to bring the affair to public attention, thus giving senator ensign to get out ahead of the story and announce it himself. does rick santorum have any potential liablity or his role
9:15 pm
in this can zal? >> he owes us an explanation. senator santorum received an email from doug hampton when doug lampton was trying to sort his way out of this mess. he sent him an email explaining the whole thing and asking for his help. he just passed the information along to senator ensign and then shut up about it. this is another guy who like tom coburn is constantly preaching of how he's better than the rest of us. here he is covering up for a fellow senator. a fellow family values senator and hiding the most sordid kind of afather. you can't imagine that we would have done the same thing had he learned such facts about a democratic senator. >> i have a feeling that we'll be talking to you about this again as this continues to unfold. thanks very much. >> thanks. we are finding out so much about our nation's declared enemies since osama bin laden's death. for instancest for instance, we learned a lot today about the al
9:16 pm
qaeda porn habit. that disclosure not only makes david letterman's job a lot easier for the next job or so, it undercuts the sell bait master minds waging a holy war image. that's coming up. that's coming up. that's next. ever wish vegetables didn't taste so vegetably? well, v8 v-fusion juice gives you a full serving of vegetables, plus a full serving of fruit. but it just tastes like fruit. v8. what's your number? your advertising mail campaign is paying off! business is good! it must be if you're doing all that overnight shipping. that must cost a fortune. it sure does. well, if it doesn't have to get there overnight, you can save a lot with priority mail flat rate envelopes. one flat rate to any state, just $4.95. that's cool and all... but it ain't my money.
9:17 pm
i seriously do not care... so, you don't care what anyone says, you want to save this company money! that's exactly what i was saying. hmmm... priority mail flat rate envelopes, just $4.95 only from the postal service. a simpler way to ship.
9:18 pm
ohio senator sherrod brown, my friend doug high and today's best new thing in the world all best new thing in the world all still to come.ttd# 1-800-345-250
9:19 pm
ttd# 1-800-345-2550 ttd# 1-800-345-2550 ttd# 1-800-345-2550 and talk to chuck about ttd# 1-800-345-2550 rolling over that old 401k. . today is the day that the phrases bin laden and porn stash got put into the sam headlines
9:20 pm
all over the internet and all over the news. reuters broke the story first. the reporters citing kurn arnt former u.s. officials who told them that a fairly extensive pornography collection was recovered from the osama bin laden compound in pakistan. everybody else picked up the story by headlining the phrase, porn stash. which made for a very confusing discussion in our newsroom before i figured out what everybody else was talking about. this story has a hom anyone problem. it is very important to know that this is not porn stash as in as in mustache. but rather porn stash as in s-t-a-s-h as in a lot of it. as in a pile of porn this high. don't say porn stash.
9:21 pm
say pornography in large quantities. say enough adult content to fill a mansion full of bunnies. it turns out osama bin laden's favorite music went -- just don't say porn stash. homonyms will be the death of the republic. the osama bin laden's other favorite use of the internet story today was fold up by furthering reporting including by nbc news that lots of al qaeda sites and suspects have been found to have porn. so much so that some u.s. officials wondering if al qaeda were using pornography to transmit messages to each other. secret messages embedded in the porn. oh, the not safe for work conversations that that reporting incited this afternoon at work. you guys are in so much trouble. whether al qaeda were using the porn for ulterior motives or the normal porn motives, frankly it's a good news cycle for anybody who wants to make al
9:22 pm
qaeda seem ridiculous. kooid kooi wants their leadership to be seen as pious and all knowing and all powerful and very scarey. they are dependent on that reputation, particularly the pious part in order to get followers around the world and to get money. and that is probably why the u.s. released that funny video. remember this one of the al qaeda in iraq guy trying to look tough shooting a weapon, but not really knowing how to do it and getting help from a friend. it's also why they released the bloopers reel of bin laden pitifully watching himself on tv and flubing his lines and taking instruction from someone as he prepared to make one of his i am all scarey and all knowing videos. and why president obama's chief counterterrorism advisor has been characterizing to the news media how dumpy and uncharismatic his second in command is. the more stupid and hypocrital and prettiful and divided they look, the less powerful they
9:23 pm
might be in real life. so bin laden porn stash day is a good day in the fight against al qaeda. on the other hand, the house of representatives yesterday voted out of committee a redeclaration of the war on terror. unlike the last declaration in september 2001, which authorized force against those responsible for 9/11, this new declaration does not even mention 9/11. the week after the u.s. killed bin laden when al qaeda has never looked weaker and lamer and more on the ropes, the republican chair of the house armed services committee has decided to reelevate al qaeda to be america's adversary. in a freshly redeclared and parentally permanent war. when the whole world was starting to think of them as pitful as the butt of the joke, now congress is telling us to think of them as all powerful again. joining us now is the u.s. senator from the great state of ohio, sherrod brown. >> good to be with you, thanks,
9:24 pm
rachel. >> i will not ask you to talk about al qaeda around pornography. >> thank you. >> i will ask you about the u.s. politics here. do you expect that it may not be more prettiy feasible to end the u.s. war in afghanistan than it was before osama bin laden was killed? >> yes. we start with that resolution in the house of representatives, republicans always play on people's fears. they play on fear of immigration and fear on race and fear of terrorism and that they just play on people's fears. that's how they typically win elections. they're not going to let this one go. more to the point of your question, i think the president was staying with the july, beginning in july timetable for withdrawal of our troops in afghanistan, anyway. i think this makes his case stronger and makes all of us hold the line in a i think in a stronger way in terms of beginning to take the troops out in july. i know that those particularly
9:25 pm
like john mccain that really want to keep our troops there longer want this sort of long-term war on terrorism to in some cases accelerate. i think they will be on the other side. i think the president will get some pressure from some of its military advisors, but withdrawal of troops from afghanistan is right for two reasons. it's right, it makes us safer and takes our troops out of harm's way and helps us deal with domestic issues on terrorism. and second it's a huge cost savings. we're spending so much money for so little gain in afghanistan that it's time to bring the troops home. >> you highlighted senator john mccain there. in my introduction i highlighted the house armed services committee chairman as people who might be on the other side of that sort of debate particularly about afghanistan. i wonder if -- i wonder if there is a potential for those guys aside, for there to actually be a real bipartisan conversation about this. nancy pelosi told me last year
9:26 pm
the next time there was a full scale debate on afghanistan it would not fall along party lines. i'm starting to believe that. i'm hearing people what has been the ron paul line in the republican party that american ought to be more isolationist in general and afghanistan might be over. do you think there are more republican voices that'd be willing to participate in their discussion? >> i think there can be. the problem is their dislike of barack obama in so many cases is so intense, if he's for withdrawal of troops, many of them reflexively are on the other side. and particularly as the presidential race is upon us. when you've watched the last two and a half years, their opposition to this president on darn mere anything as a party is overwhelming numbers. i would agree with that you say, i think there's a little bit, a lot of that going on. that being said, i think people
9:27 pm
like ron paul clearly represent a significant sort of isolationist streak in the sort of libertarian traditions of the republican party. i would not call our side who is against further troop involvement, who oppose the iraq war, i would not call us isolationists. we're internationalists. but don't think these wars have served our country well. the ron paul group that agrees with us, he and i both voted against iraq six, seven, eight years ago are coming from it from a more traditional vumt. we come down to the same place. in many ways for different reasons as ron paul and i both have opposed bad trade agreements and both a posed a give away to the drug and insurance companies. >> is there anything else that you see as changing in u.s. politics? any debates that change or any places where the debates actually break down in a partisan way differently than they might have before because of bin laden's death?
9:28 pm
is there anything in u.s. policy that you should we should keep an eye on because of that development in the fight against al qaeda? >> i guess from the initial republican reaction from leading republicans, it's always good to look out for that. i would say probably, no. i found it so interesting that as soon as the president announced this, many republicans congratulated president bush and president obama for getting osama bin laden, but it's still barack obama's fall for the problems in the economy. president bush helped get osama bin laden, but the bad economy's all barack obama's fault. they just can't resist that. it's just such a natural overreaction to them to do that that i'm hopeful that this brings some clarity to our involvement. to our protecting our country in whatever we do internationally. i don't see it yet. >> senator sherrod brown of
9:29 pm
ohio. thanks for being here. >> thanks very much. the special election in upstate new york starting with the congressman resigning because he got caught sending a shirtless picture of himself to someone he met on craig list. turns out that is the least interesting part of the story and that election. it keeps getting weirder. it keeps getting weirder. that is acs, you may not want to face the fact that you're at greater risk of a heart attack or stroke. plavix helps protect people with acs against heart attack or stroke: people like you. it's one of the most researched prescription medicines. goes beyond what they do alone by helping to keep blood platelets from sticking and forming dangerous clots. plavix. protection against heart attack or stroke in people with acs. [ female announcer ] plavix is not for everyone. certain genetic factors and some medicines such as prilosec reduce the effect of plavix leaving you at greater risk for heart attack and stroke. your doctor may use genetic tests to determine treatment. don't stop taking plavix without talking to your doctor
9:30 pm
as your risk of heart attack or stroke may increase. people with stomach ulcers or conditions that cause bleeding should not use plavix. taking plavix alone or with some other medicines, including aspirin, may increase bleeding risk, which can potentially be life threatening, so tell your doctor when planning surgery. tell your doctor all medicines you take, including aspirin, especially if you've had a stroke. if fever, unexplained weakness or confusion develops, tell your doctor promptly. these may be signs of ttp, a rare but potentially life-threatening condition, reported sometimes less than two weeks after starting plavix.
9:31 pm
9:32 pm
. monoda goodling had a fancy gig in the bush administration
9:33 pm
justice department. she worked for attorney general alberto gonzalez as his senior counsel. she had that job for about a year until she was forced to resign in the wake of what would come to be known as the u.s. attorneys scandal. she and many others were accused of politicizing law enforcement or basing hiring decisions for nonpolitical jobs on politics and political affiliation. that's not just bad form, that's illegal because hiring for those kind of jobs on the basis of political affiliation violates federal civil service laws. and so the virginia state bar publicly reform manded monica goodling. for violating the legal profession's rules of professional conduct by committing a criminal or deliberately wrongful act. that ruling was issued in march, but it was made public last week. this week she popped again on our news radar in a place and way we did not expect. there's that special election in
9:34 pm
new york. the seat where the congressman resigned after everyone saw this musly picture from him which he had been sending to ladies on the internet. monica goodling is weirdly in the middle of that special election to replace that congressman. quoting from a document, william hochul is now the u.s. attorney for the western district of new york. his wife, kathy hochul is running in a special election in new york's 26th district. monica goodling publicly reform manded for the virginia bar for not promoting this guy at the justice department because his wife was a can democrat. specifically his wife is not the democrat candidate who is running an unexpectedly close race for the district in a very red district in upstate new york. ta da. the news gods work in mysterious ways. we need flowcharts.
9:35 pm
everything about this special election is turning out to be frankly a little bit mysterious. it has to be said, or at least surprising. carl paladino. he made himself famous not only for carrying around a baseball bat a lot of the time, but for sending out emails that were so racist and sexually explicit we could not blur some of them enough to put them on basic cable. he was the most eccentric candidate for new york governor after the -- now this week in a letter dated simply wednesday morning, carl paladino announced he is getting in on this special election in new york 26 as well. he will be appearing in the district on monday to endorse jane corwin the republican candidate. the tea part candidate in the race, a man named jack davis says he plans to spend as much as $3 million on his third party campaign. jane corwin the republican has
9:36 pm
loaned her campaign more than $2.46 million. her own money. then there's the avalanche of outside money coming into the race. the national republican congressional committee spending $400,000 there. american crossroads, the karl rove conceived groupal supporting the republican candidate. they've received $650,000 in ad time there. as for outside spending for the democratic candidate, the democratic congressional campaign committee is spending $250,000, plus a new democratic group called the house majority pac says they will air tv ads next move. and have sent out a fundraising blast email. in term os of outside standing we've got more than $1 million for the republican candidate. for the democrat a quarter of that plus a promise and a blast email. but given all that in a superred district, the democrat the one who's been outfundraised by a 4-1 ratio, the polls show her right there in the running neck
9:37 pm
in neck in this bright red district. you can blame that on the tea party candidate splitting the vote on the right. or you can blame that on the republican candidate saying she would vote for the republican house budget to kill medicare, or you could blame it on hochul the democrat being an unexpectedly really good candidate in that district. or be like me and you can blame monica goodling's really, really bad republican karma. whatever you blame, this is turning out to be a very, very special election indeed.
9:38 pm
>> ( rooster crows ) >> by 2020, 50 billion network devices will roam the earth. that's seven devices per person. this will change how we work in ways we've never before imagined. what do you need to secure your people, their devices, and your business? a network that can evolve and grow to protect your human network. ♪
9:39 pm
it's true. you never forget your first subaru. so i took my heartburn pill and some antacids. we're having mexican tonight, so another pill then? unless we eat later, then pill later? if i get a snack now, pill now? skip the snack, pill later... late dinner, pill now? aghh i've got heartburn in my head. [ male announcer ] stop the madness. take prilosec otc for frequent heartburn. one pill a day. twenty-four hours. zero heartburn. no heartburn in the first place. great. [ male announcer ] use as directed for 14 days. you could get arrested for that you know. it's not what you think. look. there was a time when a company like that would envy us. little outfit. it's almost quaint. all these years we had something they could never have. something only the biggest operations could ever afford.
9:40 pm
it was our strategic advantage. now they have it. what exactly is "it" that they have? logistics. a level playing field. it's not fair. since this show went on the air about two and a half years ago, the one segment we did that got the most attention of everything we have ever done was my interview a year ago this month after the man who had just won the republican nomination for senate in the great kmob wealth of kentucky, rand paul. i had intended a wide ranging interview wound up being a single topic conversation about the civil rights act of 1964. he had expressed misgivings about the act in a previous interview. i thought he would clear it up and we would move on. he would not answer. question after question about a
9:41 pm
private business's rite to discriminate on the basis of race. >> should lunch counters been allowed to have stayed segregated. just yes or no. >> what i'm saying is that i don't believe in any discrimination. i don't believe that any private property should discriminate either. i wouldn't attend, wouldn't support, wouldn't go to. what you have to answer when you auns this point of view which is an abstract, obscure conversation from 1964 that you want to bring up, if you want to answer, you have to say then that you decide the rules for all restaurants and then do you decide that you want to allow them to carry weapons into restaurants. >> the weapons things i never quite got. but it went on and on. rand paul told me he would not have felt comfortable voting for the one part of the civil rights act that says businesses can't discriminate. he said in that interview, he would have tried to modify that part of it because he thinks business owners basically have the right to do what they want.
9:42 pm
the implication in this context was that it should be legal for an american business to say we don't serve black people. that implication got lots of attention for obvious reasons. again about a year ago. but then rand paul put out a statement saying, okay, i would have voted for the civil rights act. and then of course he was elected to the united states senate. and he's a serving senator. cut to today, literally today about four hours ago. and the very fine "hardball" program hosted by my friend chris matthews here on msnbc. his guest was congressman ron paul, senator rand paul's father. as of this morning officially a candidate again for the republican nomination for president. that same civil rights act of 19674 question came up. and frankly you should see this. we pick up the action somewhere in the middle. we do encourage you to watch the whole thing on the internet. watch. >> you would have voted against that law? you wouldn't have voted for the rights. >> i wouldn't have voted for the jim crow laws. >> you were not for the' 64
9:43 pm
civil rights bill. >> because of the prosecute rights element, not because it got rid of the jim crow rights. >> the guy who owns the bar says no blacks allowed and that's fine. >> you're democrat gagging it now. segregation was created by government laws. slavery was created by government laws. segregation -- let me go, the segregation in the military by government laws. so what we want to do as libertarians is to repeal all those laws and honor and respect people. >> ron paul would have opposed the civil rights act of 1964 because he believes people have the right to choose whatever they want to choose and let nature take its course. it ought to be legal for a business to put up a sign that says we do not serve black people today in america. ron paul is not saying he he is in favor of that, but it's not government's job to stop discrimination. let it play out. it will be okay. not the government's job. rand paul is senator used to hold that position, too, but he
9:44 pm
changed his mind when pressed. congressman ron paul still believes it. is not afraid to say it and is now as of today running for president. republican presidential nominees i know what you're thinking. "leather-trimmed command center, "almost 300 horsepower, "infiniti surround sound, "seating for seven -- wait. this is a minivan?" makes you almost want to have kids. [ child screams ] [ male announcer ] almost. the new 2011 dodge grand caravan. now get $2,000 cash allowance or 0% financing for 60 months on select 2011 dodge grand caravans. woohoo! whoa. haircolor is a chore no more! you gotta come see what's new. c'mon! tadaaa! welcome to haircolor heaven. aa-ah-ahhh! courtesy of new nice 'n easy colorblend foam. permanent, dimensional color, now in a delightful foam! just three shakes, foam it, love it!
9:45 pm
simply saturate hair root to tip, front to back. with tones and highlights. it's foamtastic! home haircolor, make room for foam haircolor! new nice 'n easy colorblend foam. your right color. ♪ i've seen the sunrise paint the desert. witnessed snowfall on the first day of spring. ♪ but the most beautiful thing i've ever seen was the image on a screen that helped our doctor see my wife's cancer was treatable. [ male announcer ] ge technologies help doctors detect cancer early so they can save more lives. bringing better health to more people. ♪ [ male announcer ] you plant. you mow. you grow. you dream. meet the new definition of durability: the john deere select series -- a four-year limited warranty
9:46 pm
dozens of attachments, and endless possibilities. what will you create? our best deals of the season are happening now. learn more at . because it's friday and because you deserve it, the former communications for the republican party joins us next. we'll be right back.
9:47 pm
9:48 pm
last week the week after the obama administration announced the death of osama bin laden, the guest list on the sunday politicsical talk shows was 3-1 bush officials to democrats. if you thought that it was an aberration, the good news is you're right. this week is ratio is no longer republican to democrat 3-1. this week is ratio the republican to democrat 8-1. this is the guest lineup for this weekend's sunday morning shows. governor nicky haley of south carolina, a republican. sheilah bexar chair of the fdic appointed to that job five years ago by president george w. bush. former speaker of the house newt gingrich now running for the republican nomination for president. current speaker of the house john boehner obviously a republican. republican congressman paul ryan of wisconsin. now contemplating a run for senate. republican leader of the senator mitch mcconnell. john kyle of arizona. ron paul of texas, who just
9:49 pm
announced he too is running for president. and senator dick durbin of illinois. nine announced marquis guests. of those nine, one of them is a democratic. dick durbin. dick durbin this weekend in american politics you are holding up half the sky. turn on the television sunday morning it would be easy to believe that the whole world is republican. that the only people worth listening to about american politics are republicans. that all political leadership in washington all politicians of any consequence are republicans. but ask republicans themselves what they think about their own politicians right now and they say something different. they say what their own party is offering the country right now in terms of leadership does not leave them psyched. i'm not talking about how much republicans seem to hate mitt romney. have you ever heard their reactions to their health care speech? wow. beyond mitt romney and his unpopularity in his own party, i'm talking about how professional republicans,
9:50 pm
republicans whose job it is to know these things. they think the whole field of republicans for president is kind of a bummer so far. >> that reality show where we have all manner of candidates, the donald trumps of the world mosaic of nonsense day in, day out, trivializing issues. >> the campaign manager talking with lawrence o'donnell earlier this week. it is steve schmidt's job to get republicans elected to jobs like president. >> i do think the field as it has been presently constituted is driving demand for other candidates to get in the race. >> at last week's first republican candidates debate, this is how another republican pro sized up the field. as we all know, there are numerous other candidates that are looking at it and thank god because we have a country that needs to get straightened out. the person who said that,
9:51 pm
republican party chairman priebus. and then there's john weaver, republican strategist, the only guy in republican politics today who is not karl rove but like him. weaver is expected to be jon huntsman's campaign manager if the former utah governor decides to run. john weaver told "time" this week, quote, this is the weakest republican field when a candidate on the ballot won in 1940. >> there's a lot of talk that it's a weak field, frankly. >> it's a weak field in the eyes of the punditry here in washington. >> it looks like a weak field. >> there's a lot of disgruntlement among a lot of the members of the gop saying we don't have a strong candidate, that the field is weak. >> republican professional operatives, their home field announcers at fox news, even some of the candidates themselves don't seem to be psyched about who the republican party has to offer the country in terms of its important voices right now. thank goodness there's sunday morning to buck up their
9:52 pm
self-esteem. joining us now is doug hi, former communications director for the national republican committee. thanks for being here. >> thank you. >> you are a professional republican. have you noticed this trend of other professional republicans and pundits saying that this is a weak field of presidential candidates? >> what i've noticed is -- and the clips certainly speak to that -- a lot of pundits and colleagues of mine who are responding to questions about this and what we've seen is a real trend that this is the soup of the day. the republicans are going to be asked when they're on television or by print reporters specifically about this. i can tell you i spoke to one senior elected official who was quoted on this issue a couple weeks ago who said, well, this is what people are asking me after i take a vote. you know, it's what the flavor of the day, the soup of the day, is. and last week it was donald trump. and before that it was the birther nonsense. if the press continues to ask the same question, we will get some answers like that, absolutely. >> you know, i think of republicans as the real
9:53 pm
disciplined message folks in politics. and even if the -- if the question is being asked and it's not a good political idea to answer it, or if people are thinking it and it's a not good idea to say it out loud, why aren't people keeping their concerns to themselves? isn't calling the field weak making the field, in fact, weaker? >> well, there could be a lot of reasons. if you supported haley barbour, wanted him to get in the race and he didn't, you may be disappointed. same with mitch daniels. john weaver with jon huntsman, for instance. you know, i'd also take you back to about this time in 1991 or this time in 1976. i bet if you asked a lot of democrats if they were happy with the field, they'd tell you no. but the reality is the democrats elected bill clinton in '92 and jimmy carter in 1976. people with the american public had never even heard of at that point. for me, i'm optimistic. we may get more candidates in. i think we're going to make some real gains in 2012. i'm optimistic. >> when you say you are optimistic and then you say
9:54 pm
right after that, comma, we might get some more candidates in, does that mean you are optimistic because you might get some more candidates in because you, too, think the field is weak and you think that the strength lies among candidates who are not yet declared? >> i think the strength is that we've got obama's record to run against. i'll point to two battleground states that obama won last time, wisconsin. since obama won wisconsin in 2008, the democrats have lost a governor's mansion, a senate seat, two house seats and today herb kohl, democrat from wisconsin, said that he wasn't going to run. my home state of north carolina, the obama campaign is not going to have a real key -- they ran a bril yanliant campaign, i can't praise what the president and his team and that great organization did on tobacco road enough, but they're not going to have a one-key element that they had last time. that's the element of surprise. republicans were caught flat-footed in 2008. my home state will not let it happen this time. so those are two battleground states that i think we can win. and certainly virginia and
9:55 pm
indiana are two other states. >> seriously, though, on wisconsin, did you notice the 100,000 people out in the streets of wisconsin hating on the republicans week after week after week after week? >> i noticed a lot of buses that were taking people into wisconsin. >> oh, seriously? doug, seriously? those were all out-of-staters? >> i don't think they all were but a good portion. >> really? wow! >> you mentioned priebus. he's from wisconsin. he'll make sure we have every resource in wisconsin that we can. if this ground swell of democrats wanting to push the democratic agenda in wisconsin, real and true and something we're going to take hold in 2012, maybe herb kohl wouldn't have announced his retirement. >> you look that kohl looked at all those people in the streets of wisconsin and said oh, boy, the republicans are going to have a good year? doug, come on. on wisconsin, you've got to admit scott walker has had a backlash. you look at republican senators facing recalls, the prospect of the senate turning democrat in the middle of its term because
9:56 pm
people are so mad at scott walker. you look at his poll numbers, and you really think wisconsin is a good-news story for republicans? >> i think wisconsin is a great news year. we've picked up a governor's mansion, two house sheaths and herb kohl announced his retirement today. that means it's yet another state -- remember patty murray said two weeks ago, she didn't expect there would be any more retirements. so this caught the democrats by surprise. they're playing defense in yet another state. my friends are already targeting it, and we're optimistic. >> doug, if you come to wisconsin with me, i'll bet you a beer you are wrong. >> you always bet those things and you always lose. the first time i was on your program, i said that rand paul and mitch mcconnell would have a unity event, and three days later they sure did. so i'll take you up on this. >> i'll pay up. you know i pay up. >> you do. i'll stand by that. >> bulk he ♪
9:57 pm
9:58 pm
9:59 pm
♪ i like your messy hair ♪ i like the clothes you wear ♪ i like the way you sing ♪ and when you dance with me ♪ you always make me smile [ male announcer ] we believe you're at your best when you can relax and be yourself. and at thousands of newly refreshed holiday inn express hotels, you always can. holiday inn express. stay you. and now stay ahead of the game. book early and save up to 20%.